Darwin conspiracy

Everyone was taught, that life began purely by chance and there was a long process of a person’s evolution. Charles Darwin is considered to be a father of “The theory of evolution” and his work “The Origin Of Species” is world-known. Every history and biology student book contains this information and even insists on it. But what if Darwin was wrong? Why did we know only this theory and was this theory truthful indeed?

Do you know how Charles Darwin begins his great work?

"You will be greatly disappointed (by the forthcoming book); it will be grievously too hypothetical. It will very likely be of no other service than collocating some facts; though I myself think I see my way approximately on the origin of the species. But, alas, how frequent, how almost universal it is in an author to persuade himself of the truth of his own dogmas."

The author himself is not sure in his work. Can it be reliable in this case?

“You haven’t got possibilities to check the facts! Don’t be silly, the whole world couldn’t be wrong or maybe you’re smart enough to argue with scientists?” – My collocutor was furious and shocked by my “stupidity”.

The point is plenty of scientists denied this theory so long ago but this fact is still under the secret.

Kids are taught that life can evolve but it needs plenty of time. This is a wrong statement, moreover it is incorrect fron the scientistic point of view.
Impossible things can't become possible no matter how much time passed.

You are waiting for the facts of course and I am not going to hide them.

FACT 1. Species Without a Link Prove Evolution Theory is Wrong

Look at the pictures. Do you see the difference? Of course you do.
The skeleton of a monky is obviously not similar to a human.
There is no a "missing link" and extinct species don't prove it was found.

Charles Darwin hoped the transitional links to be found  to prove his "Theory of Evolution." But only individual species were found and they prove nothing.

And this is true: transitional forms were never found.

Actually vice versa they prove  an evolutionary process to be failed. If this process was true, all plants, animals, and insects would be in a continual state of change forever. 

"Evolution is unproved and improvable, we believe it because the only alternative is special creation, which is unthinkable." (Sir Arthur Keith, a militant anti-Christian physical anthropologist)

FACT 2. Muations

Another famous part of the theory that this factor [mutation] was extremely important for a cell’s evolution.

And below is the statement from modern scientists.

"Mutations (DNA replication errors) are the result of DNA that is replicated with damage that passes on to the offspring. Mutations are very rare because of DNA checking and repair. However, one in every ten million duplications of a DNA molecule can result in a mutation (error). The mutation changes are random, unpredictable errors that cause crippling diseases, loss of function and the destruction of the host person or animal. Mutations destroy the species. They do not improve the species. Mutations never lead to a new species as falsely claimed by evolutionists."

Do you remember in our school textbooks was an example about bacterium that developed immunity to penicillin? Let’s observe another explanation.

In simple terms the variant that both groups of bacteria (some had such an immunity and others didn’t) existed at the same time is much more plausible. Thus others died and that strong group survived. Anyway a bacterium remained a bacterium and its organism wasn’t improved. But evolution does imply improvement.

FACT 3. Chaos From Organization Proves Evolution is Wrong

The second law of thermodynamics proves evolution to be wrong.  Nothing can appear from chaos.  An organism cannot be rearranged  into an organism of a higher form by itself.
Everything is close to a lower state, not higher. The genes of plants, insects, animals, and humans if to put them i an uncontroled condition are continually becoming defective, not improving. Species  become extinct, not evolving. Order will always move to disoder, not vice versa.

“So you are saying we were created by God, aren't you? It is ridiculous, it is impossible to believe!” – common words of evolutionists. But if the Theory of evolution still remains as a theory but not a law, can it be trusted? There are so many inconsistencies that the only way to take the theory is on trust. The creationism is taken on trust a priori and anyway we can find proofs in the Bible.

The choice is yours: the theory of evolution lost its authority long ago and nowadays considered to be controversial.

Were we lied? It seems to be. Why were we lied? It is a good open question.